Done -- both on master and release-2.x branches. *Artifact Id:* log4j-layout-json-template → log4j-layout-template-json *Package:* org.apache.logging.log4j.layout.json.template → org.apache.logging.log4j.layout.template.json
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 4:48 PM Carter Kozak <cko...@ckozak.net> wrote: > Thanks, Volkan! > > The proposed "layout.<encoding>" package name sounds like an improvement > to me, but I don't have a strong preference either way. > > On Thu, Aug 20, 2020, at 10:07, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > > Hello, > > Good news everyone! JTL has landed on release-2.x! (I have also added > GitHub Actions support for release-2.x branch, though it is failing right > now, I will check it momentarily.) What I want to ask is... Shall I rename > the package from `o.a.l.l.layout.json.template` to > `o.a.l.l.layout.template.json`? I am inclined to go with the latter one, > since in the future we can add `...layout.template.xml`, > `...layout.template.string`, etc. (As I shared earlier, I actually want to > build a successor StringTemplateLayout, where any string rendering, be it > JSON or XML, would be possible.) What do you think? > > Cheers! > > >
