I’ll take care of it. Ralph
> On Aug 18, 2020, at 3:46 PM, Robert Middleton <osfan6...@gmail.com> wrote: > > By my count at this point, that means we have 3 binding +1 votes from > Ralph, Christian, Remko; and +1 votes from Thorsten and Stephen. > > Ralph, do you want to upload to the releases repo with the fix for the .sha > file, or do you want me to do that?(it is a SHA-512, it's just named > incorrectly) > > -Robert Middleton > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 5:47 AM Stephen Webb <swebb2...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I am using a recent version in production Ubuntu servers, so it is >> definitely release ready. >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Aug 17, 2020, 7:27 PM Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I am not an expert on c++ or something, but I looked on the content, read >>> this thread and think it is safe to release this. However, my hope is >> that >>> in future more competent cxx devs than me would check it :) >>> >>> I vote +1 also >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Christian >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2020, at 08:08, Ralph Goers wrote: >>>> I noticed that the files have she and md5 files. We are not supposed to >>>> use either of these any more and only use sha512. I can fix that. >>>> >>>> I vote +1 >>>> >>>> Ralph >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Aug 9, 2020, at 10:24 AM, Robert Middleton <osfan6...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I've run through the release of log4cxx 0.11.0. There's still >>> something >>>>> strange about how it all works(mostly due to the tooling of shell >>>>> script/maven/ant/cmake/autotools). However, I do believe that I >> have a >>>>> workable release at this point. A quick note on the release: I did >> the >>>>> 'mvn release:prepare' manually, which is where these artifacts come >>> from; >>>>> running through the 'mvn release:perform' causes the generated files >>> to be >>>>> -SNAPSHOT versioned, instead of 0.11.0. This means that the version >>> of the >>>>> pom.xml in the tag is still 0.11.0-SNAPSHOT, but since maven isn't >>> really >>>>> used to build I don't think this will be an issue. >>>>> >>>>> Artifacts uploaded here: >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4cxx/ >>>>> tag: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/tree/v0.11.0-RC2 >>>>> >>>>> The artifacts are signed, although I still need to send my key to >> Matt >>> so >>>>> he can import it into the logging KEYS file. >>>>> >>>>> -Robert Middleton >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>
