I'll sign and publish the artifacts today.

On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 at 17:43, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Remko. That makes 3 +1 votes from PMC members.
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Aug 3, 2020, at 2:12 PM, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1 Remko.
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 1:04 AM Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 from me. We can handle the release signing afterwards as Ralph suggests.
> >>
> >> On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 at 10:30, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Can other PMC members  please review this? It has been more than 72
> >> hours.
> >>>
> >>> Ralph
> >>>
> >>>> On Jul 30, 2020, at 11:17 PM, Davyd McColl <davyd.mcc...@codeo.co.za>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi all, I've never done this before, so bear with me if I fluff it:
> >>>>
> >>>> This is a proposed vote to release log4net 2.0.9 from PR
> >> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/pull/61
> >>>>
> >>>> Release artifacts (including source zip) are at:
> >> https://ci.appveyor.com/project/fluffynuts/logging-log4net/builds/34063235/artifacts
> >>>> Source can be checked out from
> >> https://github.com/fluffynuts/logging-log4net/logging-log4net, tag rel/
> >> 2.0.9. I can't push tags to the upstream, but this tag is exactly the
> >> same commit as the last in the PR mentioned above, which was accepted into
> >> master a few days ago.
> >>>>
> >>>> Please check out the artifacts & if everyone is ok with what's there,
> >> please can someone with the rights to publish to nuget do so.
> >>>>
> >>>> Once I've seen how this process works, I'd like to tackle the CVE that
> >> has been brought up on this list more than once -- it's a simple change
> >> which was already committed to the develop branch some time ago, so there
> >> are a couple of options here:
> >>>> 1. cherry-pick that commit & do a 2.0.10 release pronto, with only
> >> that change
> >>>> 2. trawl the develop branch to see what else was already solved in
> >> there, and get that out as 2.0.10, and perhaps close out that branch to
> >> avoid future confusion.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks for your time
> >>>> -d
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
> >>
>
>


-- 
Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to