Part of the problem here is none of the people who are actively committing code 
are using .NET, so we would have a hard time answering that. One of the former 
maintainers mentioned a project named serilog but that is the extent of my 
knowledge.

Also, at this point this is a discussion. If 3 people were to suddenly appear 
and get the project moving the PMC would gladly support that. But this has been 
an ongoing problem for the past 3 years so something needs to be done.

Ralph

> On Mar 21, 2020, at 8:45 PM, Brown, Michael <m...@purdue.edu> wrote:
> 
> Are there better replacements for Log4net? What would it take to migrate to 
> them?
> ________________________________
> From: Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2020 21:31
> To: Apache Logging Developers List <dev@logging.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [Discuss] Retire Log4net to the attic.
> 
> I agree with retiring log4net into the attic.
> 
> 
> 
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 9:57 AM Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> I'm not foreseeing needing or helping on this one, so the attic is OK by
>> me.
>> 
>> Gary
>> 
>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 8:15 PM Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> The PMC has struggled for several years trying to attract new developers
>>> to the project and has not succeeded. The latest discussion was last
>>> October where a few individuals expressed some interest but nothing came
>> of
>>> that.  One individual apparently migrated the builds to azure but they
>>> don’t appear to be publicly viewable.
>>> 
>>> Log4Net has had 3 pull requests this year none of which has had any
>>> comments. There are 7 open PRs from 2019. There are currently 34 open
>> pull
>>> requests and no pull requests have been merged since October 2018.
>>> 
>>> The only PMC members or committers who have recently worked on Log4net
>>> indicated some time ago that they would no longer be able to work on the
>>> project.
>>> 
>>> We would appreciate any thoughts on this before we hold a vote to retire
>>> the project.
>>> 
>>> Ralph
>>> 
>> 


Reply via email to