Reconfiguring already is a fast and robust operation. But if you have 
status=“debug” enabled it is a little disconcerting to see it configure 4 times.

Ralph

> On Oct 9, 2019, at 11:49 AM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> If we made reconfiguring a fast and robust operation, there’d be nothing
> wrong with that approach.
> 
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 13:41, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> I am sure we could, but I am not sure how that helps the usage in Spring.
>> 
>> Another thought would be to have Log4j reconfigure when it finally has
>> access to a configuration in the application.yaml, but that would mean
>> configuring Log4j a 4th time.
>> 
>> Ralph
>> 
>>> On Oct 9, 2019, at 11:12 AM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Can we provide a log4j configuration facade API for doing common
>>> programmatic configuration tasks like that? Think Configurator but for
>>> manipulating certain aspects of a Configuration that's already
>>> running.
>>> 
>>> On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 12:49, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Recently I added support for Spring Cloud Config to Log4j.  In an
>> effort to continue to persuade Spring to use Log4j as the default Logging
>> implementation I would like to consider other ways we could improve our
>> Spring integration. The problem is, I am not really sure what that would be.
>>>> 
>>>> Currently, Spring uses a lowest common denominator approach in that you
>> can configure root logging levels in application.yaml but it doesn’t
>> support declaring appenders or filters. I’ve thought about being able to
>> add the log4j logging configuration to the application.yaml, but Spring
>> Boot actually initializes logging 3 times - once in SpringApplication.java
>> where it has an SLF4J logger declared, again in Spring’s “boot” logger, and
>> lastly when it initializes logging for the application. I am pretty sure
>> only this last one would have any hope of being able to use the
>> application.yaml and even then I am not sure if the logging configuration
>> happens before it is available to be accessed.  I also thought about
>> creating a Spring Lookup to be able to access Spring properties, but again
>> if Log4j initializes before Spring the variables would not be available.
>>>> 
>>>> Thoughts or ideas?
>>>> 
>>>> Ralph
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>


Reply via email to