Specifically, the entire stack of dependencies for httpd is very complex to build out-of-tree. I'm looking at different apr consumers within the ASF including log4cxx as test build targets for when we are getting a new apr release ready, and as we near apr 2.0 evolution. This is both Unix, and for Windows builds.
When I have an issue ticketed I'll bring it to this list again. On Tue, May 14, 2019, 15:44 Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: > I believe it was to make the build process more portable, but I don’t > remember the exact details. He was working on some sort of automated > testing for libraries that use APR. > > On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 14:48, Robert Middleton <osfan6...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Build tooling meaning what exactly? Making it easy to include the > > libraries in your application? > > > > -Robert Middleton > > > > On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 10:57 AM Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I was speaking with Bill Rowe from httpd/apr the other day at > > > ApacheCon Roadshow, and he's been working on some build tooling > > > improvements for C and C++ projects starting from apr. I'd like to > > > start this thread somewhat as a reminder to myself about this. He said > > > it may be possible that it's useful for log4net as well, though that's > > > unknown at this time. > > > > > > -- > > > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> > > > > > > -- > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >
