I should add that each module must have a unique package hierarchy so, in general, the package names should be org.apache.logging.log4j.modulename. In this case it would be org.apache.logging.log4j.jeromq.apppender. The mom package probably has no value.
Ralph > On Jan 28, 2018, at 2:23 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > > Any component that is not in the core module MUST NOT use the core package. > That would make it impossible to package them as Java 9 modules. > > Ralph > >> On Jan 28, 2018, at 11:31 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> Now that the ZeroMQ via JeroMQ support is in its own module log4j-jeromq, I >> wonder if the Java package should change from >> >> org.apache.logging.log4j.core.appender.mom.jeromq >> >> to >> >> org.apache.logging.log4j.appender.mom.jeromq >> >> ? >> >> Same for the recently moved JPA appender. >> >> Same for impending move of the Kafka appender. >> >> This would break BC for Core for apps that directly reference these >> classes. As opposed to referencing the appenders from an XML/JSON/YAML >> config file. >> >> Gary >
