I suggest that next time we want to add a Java 9 version of something
not actuallly used in log4j-api, we create a Java 9 version of
log4j-core and put it there.
On 2017-11-25 17:53, Ralph Goers wrote:
It is there because there is a Java 9 version of it and I did not want to make
multiple Java 9 modules.
Ralph
On Nov 25, 2017, at 7:54 AM, Mikael Ståldal <mi...@apache.org> wrote:
Regarding https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2126
Why is ProcessIdUtil in log4j-api in the first place? It is only used from
log4j-core. Can't we move it to log4j-core?
I think that in general, we have too much things in log4j-api, and that causes
problems like this.
