I mean in the logging services project. So it'd be a new repo.

On 19 October 2017 at 10:48, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:

> When you say “another component in the project” do you mean logging
> services project or log4j? I’d prefer to see you do this in a separate repo
> or at least a branch until we understand what it looks like. If it is going
> to apply to many things it probably makes sense to be a separate repo.
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Oct 19, 2017, at 8:26 AM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > For generic structured records, I'd probably go with Avro or Thrift since
> > LogEvents have a lot of standard fields with only a few optional map-like
> > structures. For optimized log appending, the binary format was proposed
> as
> > a way to append quickly and without garbage IIRC.
> >
> > On 19 October 2017 at 10:21, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> What about BSON?
> >>
> >> Gary
> >>
> >> On Oct 19, 2017 08:41, "Matt Sicker" <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I don't have the ticket on hand, but a few months ago, Remko suggested
> a
> >>> binary logging format that would allow for super fast appends of
> >>> log-specific information along with companion files for additional
> >> metadata
> >>> not commonly used in log messages. I've been thinking about this idea a
> >> bit
> >>> in relation to existing structured layouts (both textual and binary),
> >> and I
> >>> was thinking that it might be a useful format to standardize on for all
> >> the
> >>> logging projects.
> >>>
> >>> What I'd like to propose is making another component in the project
> that
> >>> would contain a reference implementation of encoding and decoding the
> >>> format in Java, C++, .NET, and PHP (or as a C binding for PHP).
> >>> Potentially, this format could be inclusive with other logging projects
> >>> like Logstash, Logback, Splunk, etc.
> >>>
> >>> What do you all think? Is this a good idea? Or would this be
> duplicating
> >>> effort from other standards already?
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
>
>
>


-- 
Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to