On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 13:07:13 +0100 Dominig ar Foll <[email protected]> said:
> > Hello, > > one of the reason why I opened this thread, is because, I was expecting > that some of you had missed (or dismissed) the previous discussion not > realising that it could affect them. > > When it comes to the "to come side effects" on our every day work, this > is still open and that is why I have started a new thread yesterday, > calling for feedback on on the Tizen-Yocto based workforce. > Please look at the offer from the infra team and make your comment. > > As stated by Kevin, backward OBS compatibility will be kept anyhow for > those who are either in love of it, or dependent due to their internal > infra. > > Personally, I will happy to switch :-) given my experience of OE... i think it's cleaner than OBS or GBS. it nicely handles building entire images already for a wide range of target hardware/platforms and doesn't need qemu+misc bin emul which obviates the need for root which is good. i'd say that we should at least consider a long-term move to this and deprecate obs/gbs and eventually drop it once everything is working over in OE/yocto land -- Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
