Hi Chia-Ping,

Ack

Thanks,
Mickael

On Tue, Apr 14, 2026 at 6:37 PM Mickael Maison <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Matthias,
>
> Yes go ahead.
>
> Thanks,
> Mickael
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2026 at 6:16 PM Chia-Ping Tsai <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > hi Micakel
> >
> > I've backported PR 22053 <https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/22053> to
> > the 4.3 branch, as PoAn mentioned earlier.
> >
> > Matthias J. Sax <[email protected]> 於 2026年4月15日週三 上午12:13寫道:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I just merged a small PR to fix some JavaDocs for KIP-1271 changes. Can
> > > I cherry-pick it to 4.3 branch?
> > >
> > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/22043
> > >
> > > -Matthias
> > >
> > > On 4/14/26 5:03 AM, Mickael Maison wrote:
> > > > Hi PoAn,
> > > >
> > > > Yes we'll want to address these if possible.
> > > > Scanners will also spot the plexus-utils CVE in the binaries. Even
> > > > though looking at the code it's not exploitable.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Mickael
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2026 at 1:18 PM PoAn Yang <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Hi Mickael,
> > > >>
> > > >> I built image for 4.2.1-rc0 and found three CVE. Do we also want to add
> > > this to 4.3.0?
> > > >>
> > > >> Failed Docker Build Test CI:
> > > >> JVM:
> > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/actions/runs/24325917628/job/71021064066
> > > >> Native:
> > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/actions/runs/24333619117/job/71044984045
> > > >>
> > > >> JVM image: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-20373
> > > >>
> > > >> Native image:
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-20446
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-20447
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >> PoAn
> > > >>
> > > >>> On Apr 13, 2026, at 10:30 PM, Mickael Maison 
> > > >>> <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Hi PoAn,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Yes having these changes in 4.3 would be useful.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks,
> > > >>> Mickael
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2026 at 1:52 PM PoAn Yang <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Hi Mickael,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I have some PRs related to trivy action and release.py. Can I
> > > backport them to 4.3 branch?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> 1. Change trivy action to approved one in
> > > apache/infrastructure-actions.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/commit/eb6ce0e3d9c22ea1c34ecca293555f9fcad17981
> > > >>>>
> > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/commit/acd37fc30c5fdbbae772144c73b4f2c7e1c21d27
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> 2. Update release.py to remove -SNAPSHOT in version.py, so we don’t
> > > get error in StreamsUpgradeTest.test_app_upgrade e2e.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/22031
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Thanks,
> > > >>>> PoAn
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> On Apr 11, 2026, at 10:55 PM, Lianet Magrans <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Hi Mickael,
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> I just merged the fix for the recent blocker
> > > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-20428
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Thanks!
> > > >>>>> Lianet
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2026 at 7:07 PM Matthias J. Sax <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Thanks. PR got merged.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> -Matthias
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On 4/10/26 12:32 PM, Mickael Maison wrote:
> > > >>>>>>> Hi Matthias,
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Yes let's revert that commit.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > > >>>>>>> Mickael
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2026 at 8:43 PM Matthias J. Sax <[email protected]>
> > > >>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Hey Mickael,
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> I just realized that we did merge a PR to trunk (before 4.3
> > > branch cut)
> > > >>>>>>>> to add a new config for KIP-1071, but we are still not using this
> > > >>>>>>>> config. To avoid confusing users, I propose to revert this change
> > > in
> > > >>>>>>>> 4.3. Prepared a PR for its. Please let me know if that's ok to
> > > merge.
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/22020
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> -Matthias
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> On 3/30/26 11:22 AM, Justine Olshan via dev wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>> I'll be picking a small bugfix to 4.3 -- KAFKA-20310, just
> > > missed the
> > > >>>>>>>>> branch cut and it's a bugfix.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2026 at 9:58 AM Matthias J. Sax <
> > > [email protected]>
> > > >>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> I took the liberty to update the release wiki page, adding
> > > KIP-1271 as
> > > >>>>>>>>>> "completed" -- it was incorrectly listed as postponed.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> The Jira ticket is still open, as we add more test etc, but the
> > > KIP is
> > > >>>>>>>>>> already completed.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> -Matthias
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> On 3/30/26 9:25 AM, Mickael Maison wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jose,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Yes you can apply that to 4.3.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Mickael
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2026 at 6:08 PM José Armando García Sancio via
> > > dev
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Mickael,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I merged KAFKA-19541 to the 4.3 branch as discussed earlier.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I also just merged a bug fix (1) to trunk for the issue
> > > KAFKA-19851
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> (2) introduced in the 4.0 release. Some users have
> > > encountered this
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> issue. The workaround is to delete all configurations removed
> > > by AK
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> 4.0. It would be nice to make this fix available in the 4.3
> > > release.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> What do you think?
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> (1)
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/commit/a35d6492fbf8068cdb025419178434cbae3a991b
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> (2) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-19851
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> -José
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >

Reply via email to