Hi All, Ping on this KIP.
I've updated it based on Mickael's feedback, would appreciate more eyes on this. Thanks Nilesh On Wed, Apr 8, 2026 at 8:01 PM nileshkumar3 <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks Mickael for the review. > > MM1 - Agree, the collision between GET /connectors/expanded and GET > /connectors/{connector} for a connector named "expanded" is an issue. > We'll use GET /connectors-details and a new resource class to avoid > collision with GET /connectors/{connector}. > > MM2 - I think that's fair to ignore "expand" in the next major release > and just return the list of connectors. This keeps the API aligned > with the others in terms of not returning a 400 for that parameter. In > the first release we can add a log warning with the existing > functionality. > > MM3 - Added the concrete example in the KIP. The response should be > the same as before. > > I have added all suggestions to the KIP. Please have another look and > let me know if you have any other feedback. > > Thanks > Nilesh
