Hi everyone,

Thanks for asking this, Anukalp, as I had a similar question. I noticed the
project I proposed for ("Compatible with TPU & integrate SOTA time series
foundation models for IoTDB-AINode") wasn't assigned to a student this
summer.

While this is my first time participating in the GSoC process, I am still
very interested in building this feature. If an unassigned project remains
open for general contributions, I would love to pick up this issue and work
on making IoTDB compatible with TPUs independently.

Let me know if the community is open to me tackling this now, or if the
core team prefers to preserve the issue specifically for next year's GSoC.
I'm happy to contribute either way!

On Fri, May 1, 2026 at 9:14 AM Anukalp Pandey <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi  Haonan Hou,
>
> I wanted to send a quick note to thank you for mentorship and time during
> the GSoC application process. I really enjoyed diving into the Apache IoTDB
> ecosystem!
>
> I noticed that the Flink Table Mode project wasn't assigned to any student
> this summer. I was wondering if you might have a brief moment to share any
> feedback on my proposal, or if the project itself was simply put on hold
> due to slot limitations this year? Any insight you can provide would be
> greatly appreciated.
>
> Since I would like to stay involved with the community, are there any other
> areas to focus within the IoTDB project where you recommend I can continue
> contributing and learning?
>
> Additionally, I opened a few small PRs addressing some Sonarcloud bug
> fixes. I know you are busy, but if you have some spare time, I would be
> incredibly grateful if you could review them:
>
> 1. https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/17288
> 2. https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/17256
> 3. https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/17247
> 4. https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/17243
>
> Thank you. I look forward to your feedback and guidance!
>
> Best regards
> Anukalp Pandey
>

Reply via email to