Sounds good to me!

-Jack

On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 12:39โ€ฏPM Brian Olsen <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Iโ€™ve spoken to Ryan and the understanding is that anyone in the community
> would have access upon request. Assuming theyโ€™re only getting read roles to
> public repos like these apps request for anyways.
>
> Tools like Orbit have a free open source tier that can be used but it is
> limited to 3-5 users. We are paying for Common Room in Tabular and
> Confluent/Kafka and Imply/Druid have this integration set up as well.
>
> Iโ€™d be happy to discuss getting one of these set up for PMC usage but I
> would mostly be using the one in Tabular. So the PMC one would be a shared
> way to manage a view off the community for PMC work vs DevRel work.
>
> Does that make sense?
>
> On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 11:57 AM Jack Ye <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Seems like a valuable and interesting product to use!
>>
>> Are there any restrictions on Apache side to use such product
>> integration? Is it a free product for us to use?
>>
>> Best,
>> Jack Ye
>>
>> On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 9:23โ€ฏAM Brian Olsen <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Great question!
>>>
>>> I asked the same questions to Common Room and this is what they
>>> responded with:
>>>
>>> So with the app, we can pull deltas. With using the method with our own
>>>> auth, we donโ€™t. Iโ€™m not sure if itโ€™s a limitation in how it was written,
>>>> since our auth was written years ago, before we supported all the activity
>>>> types. But I do understand that activities like stars would have to be
>>>> repulled every time with our method, so we opt not to do that.
>>>
>>>
>>> I looked into how their competitor does it
>>> <https://orbit.love/docs/all/github-integration#aed6c486fcd746098531d5dda92a641c>
>>> and they also do the same. I'm not sure why. I imagine scraping is much
>>> more difficult and limited as the website is always subject to change. We
>>> used Orbit in the Trino community and none of the data they scraped
>>> required private access. So my best guess is that GitHub doesn't allow
>>> incremental updates and no way of scraping the site without pulling
>>> everything, all at once. Which is what they do when you run a proof of
>>> concept with them.
>>>
>>> Other Apache communities have connected with them so maybe a next step
>>> could be to reach out to some of those communities or I'd be happy to bring
>>> anyone who is interested on to a phone call with Common Room to ask any
>>> other quesitons.
>>>
>>> Let me know what you think.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 10:54 AM Russell Spitzer <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Could you please elaborate on what Common room really is and why it
>>>> needs special permissions? I'm would have thought just generic public
>>>> access would be enough to check PR's, Issues and such?
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 7:17โ€ฏPM Anton Okolnychyi
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Seems valuable to me.
>>>>>
>>>>> - Anton
>>>>>
>>>>> On May 18, 2023, at 2:44 PM, Brian Olsen <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hey all,
>>>>> My name is Brian and I'm the new Head of Developer Relations working
>>>>> at Tabular. I'd like to set up Common <https://www.commonroom.io/>
>>>>> Room <https://www.commonroom.io/> for us to have a bit of a pulse on
>>>>> the community. I would like to see if the community is interested in
>>>>> enabling read-only
>>>>> <https://docs.commonroom.io/get-started/integrations/github#required-permissions>
>>>>> permissions for the apache/iceberg and apache/icberg-docs for the GitHub
>>>>> integration. Here's how the information would be used:
>>>>>
>>>>>    - Triage issues and PRs
>>>>>    - Learn ways to improve developer/contributor experience in the
>>>>>    community
>>>>>    - Understand which PRs and issues are not getting attention and why
>>>>>    - Set alerts and notifications for the Developer Relations team to
>>>>>    follow up on issues to help drive changes in Iceberg
>>>>>    - Metrics reporting to showcase Iceberg usage to drive further
>>>>>    adoption and interest in Iceberg
>>>>>    - Gaining a better understanding of the ways people use Iceberg
>>>>>    and the features they are interested in
>>>>>    - Showcase the diversity of contributions the Iceberg project
>>>>>
>>>>> Is everyone okay with me setting this up so I can help the community
>>>>> with things like roadmap updates and making sure we follow up on reviews?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>

Reply via email to