On Fri, Dec 6, 2024 at 10:07 PM Lari Hotari <lhot...@apache.org> wrote:
> Thanks for sharing your experiences and recommendations, Dave. > > On Fri, 6 Dec 2024 at 20:28, Dave Fisher <w...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Do others have preferences for the website solution? What are your > thoughts? > > > What kind of content would we like to have on the website? Could we > reuse some content that has been published about Hunter in the past and > repurpose it for the website? How do we resolve copyright matters if > content is reused? > > > > These questions should be discussed before choosing the website > framework. > +1, could the original authors of Hunter share views around these > discussion points? > Hi Lari In terms of content, I think the intent is to a) take the rather lengthy README and split it into end user docs and developer docs b) with a framework that wasn't decided yet, but would make sense to use whatever is mainstream python nowadays. (RST still?) c) regular stuff like where the repo is, downlaods, mailing lists d) material about the history of the project and problem space, similar to https://nyrkio.com/product (especially the conference papers at the end) In a background thread when filling in the application, I think we provisionally agreed that Alex has a vision and energy for the website, whereas I would be focusing on upstreaming several patches we developed in our own fork. Alex already merged everything from confluent to the datastax upstream in the Summer. Of course, everyone else is free to have opinions and actively help too. Just sharing what I expect to happen in the coming week or two. henrik
