Hi Rory, Thank you for your feedback. To address your questions:
1. I haven’t seen a requirement for an mcp-server helm chart at this time. 2. Regarding your second point, gravitino-iceberg-rest-server and gravitino-lance-rest-server are intended for standalone deployments. While the main Gravitino chart includes auxiliary service deployments for these components, using separate charts for standalone use cases provides better clarity and prevents the configurations from becoming overly complex. Best Regards, Danhua Wang On Mon, Mar 30, 2026 at 3:14 PM roryqi <[email protected]> wrote: > OK for me. > > Two questions: > 1. Do we need `mcp-server` helm chart, too? > 2. Could we have a helm chart to install different Docker images? > > Minghuang Li <[email protected]> 于2026年3月30日周一 15:03写道： > > > > I totally agree. > > > > As Jerry mentioned, this will significantly improve the user experience > by making the charts much easier to consume. > > > > Thanks for proposing this, Danhua. > > > > Best, > > Minghuang Li > > > > On 2026/03/30 03:06:23 DanHua Wang wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > As we begin publishing charts starting with version 1.3.0, I would > like to > > > propose the creation of the following docker hub repositories for chart > > > releases: > > > > > > - apache/gravitino-helm > > > - apache/gravitino-iceberg-rest-server-helm > > > - apache/gravitino-lance-rest-server-helm > > > > > > You can find more details regarding this proposal here: > > > https://github.com/apache/gravitino/pull/10515. > > > > > > Please let me know if you have any feedback or if you would suggest > > > alternative naming conventions for these repositories. > > > > > > -- > > > Danhua Wang > > > Best Regards > > > >
