So, we just submit edits to COMMITWATCHERS going forward? Thanks Owen!
On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 11:07 AM Owen Nichols <[email protected]> wrote: > To make opt-in and opt-out less noisy for the dev list, the subscription > mechanism has been moved to COMMITWATCHERS file under source control to > provide self-service (like with CODEOWNERS or CODEWATCHERS). > > From: Jacob Barrett <[email protected]> > Date: Friday, March 4, 2022 at 1:20 PM > To: > Subject: Re: Commit message review opt-in > Can we please agree to send requests for inclusion directly to > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> rather than back to this > thread. > > On Mar 4, 2022, at 1:09 PM, Owen Nichols <[email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]>> wrote: > > Thanks Udo, I have added kohlmu-pivotal as requested, for non-draft PRs > only. > > From: Udo Kohlmeyer <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > Date: Friday, March 4, 2022 at 1:03 PM > To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> < > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > Subject: Re: Commit message review opt-in > I’ll opt-in please. > > --Udo > > From: Owen Nichols <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > Date: Saturday, February 26, 2022 at 10:44 AM > To: geode <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > Subject: Commit message review opt-in > If you received an automated-looking PR review comment from > onichols-pivotal in the past few weeks without consent, I apologize and > have withdrawn it. > > If you would like to continue receiving these automated reviews, you may > opt-in by emailing me your github username (also let me know if you want > your Draft PRs included or not). > > Geode’s guidelines for commit messages should be interpreted as > suggestions, not rules. All Geode committers are welcomed with "we like to > work on trust, not unnecessary restrictions". I hope this change to opt-in > better reflects that spirit. >
