I support making LGTM a gating job on every PR.

On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 2:46 PM Alexander Murmann <amurm...@vmware.com>
wrote:

> +1 to adding this. Given it has a low false-positive rate, only checks on
> code actually changed in the PR and runs quickly compared to some of our
> other steps that already happen for every PR, this seems like an easy
> decision.
>
> ________________________________
> From: Robert Houghton <rhough...@vmware.com>
> Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2021 14:20
> To: dev@geode.apache.org <dev@geode.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Adding LTGM as gating PR checks
>
> Short answer would be to work with the rest of the community to get the
> check to pass, fix the LGTM configuration, something like that. Otherwise,
> the Concourse CI has the ability to set PR context messages.
>
> -Robert
>
> From: Owen Nichols <onich...@vmware.com>
> Date: Thursday, December 16, 2021 at 10:40 AM
> To: dev@geode.apache.org <dev@geode.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Adding LTGM as gating PR checks
> Requiring LGTM looks good to me.  It does not seem to have a high rate of
> false-positives like some other linters, but if we are making it gating,
> what would the process look like to override a false-positive?
>
> On 12/16/21, 10:37 AM, "Anthony Baker" <bak...@vmware.com> wrote:
>
>     Thanks Robert, I think this is important. I think this is a good first
> step.
>
>     In future I think we should consider adding a CI job to ensure that
> pre-existing security errors are addressed. Perhaps GitHub code scanning is
> worth investigating since they have acquired the LGTM product.
>
>     Anthony
>
>
>     > On Dec 16, 2021, at 10:08 AM, Robert Houghton <rhough...@vmware.com>
> wrote:
>     >
>     > We have had LGTM tests enabled on Apache Geode PRs for quite some
> time, and have done a great job of trending those warnings and errors to in
> the right direction. I would like to make the change to our GitHub to make
> those changes blocking for all new PRs, given their reliability and
> lack-of-flakiness.
>     >
>     > Does anyone have strong feelings against that?
>     >
>     > -Robert Houghton
>
>

Reply via email to