A PR in "Draft" mode simply conveys that at least one more commit is coming 
before it will be "done".  Reviewers generously volunteer their time to look at 
your PR, and are welcome to look at it while in draft mode if they wish, but if 
they are quite busy, some may prefer to wait until the PR is plausibly 
code-complete before setting aside time to review it.

Sorry if I wasn't clear, I don't mean that flaky failures should mean a PR is 
not done.  You can always refer to the latest mass test report for a list of 
known flaky failures, but often I will see those and retrigger them for you 
anyway.

I expect that most PR submitters will be monitoring their own PR checks and 
taking it back to draft mode as soon as they realize more changes are needed.  
But if as a community we agree to use draft mode to communicate status in this 
way, it shouldn't matter who does it.

Due to CODEOWNERS, some reviewers have a huge number of PRs in their queue.  
Clearly communicating the status of your PR allows reviewers to focus their 
time on PRs that are ready for review.

On 5/6/21, 8:51 AM, "Jens Deppe" <jde...@vmware.com> wrote:

    Comments inline…

    Please keep your PR in draft mode anytime it is not ready to be reviewed.

    This includes if you have received request for changes, or if any PR checks 
are not passing.

    How do I know if everyone is done reviewing? Or even who might be 
reviewing? Different reviewers may be looking at different areas, depending on 
the scope of the change. If the PR suddenly switches back to ‘Draft` what does 
that mean if I’m reviewing it? Worse still, if I’m the owner and someone else 
switches it to Draft I’m not notified.

    Additionally, many PR checks fail for reasons unrelated to the PR so 
switching blindly to ‘Draft’ seems pointless.


    If you’re reviewing someone’s PR, and notice any checks not passing or you 
are requesting changes, please also click “Convert to draft”.

    I really don’t agree with this – if you have an issue with a PR for 
whatever reason, please respect the author and address it directly with them. I 
certainly feel uncomfortable ‘messing’ with someone else’s PR and, by the same 
token, don’t want my PRs adjusted without my input.

    --Jens

Reply via email to