Sounds good, I have added this to the 1.14 blocker board

On 3/12/21, 10:32 PM, "Darrel Schneider" <dar...@vmware.com> wrote:

    +1
    ________________________________
    From: Raymond Ingles <ring...@vmware.com>
    Sent: Friday, March 12, 2021 4:29 PM
    To: dev@geode.apache.org <dev@geode.apache.org>
    Subject: [Proposal] Backport GEODE-9029 - Initial support for Redis SLOWLOG 
command

    Hello –

     Putting forward the proposal to backport GEODE-9029 (Redis SLOWLOG command 
support) to support/1.14 branch,

    What does GEODE-9029 do?

              *   It adds unit/integration/dunit tests for the Redis SLOWLOG 
command
              *   It moves the SLOWLOG command to the ‘Supported’ category

    These changes are low-risk as they are limited entirely to the Geode’s 
Redis-compatibility subsystem and do not impact any other Geode code.

    The version of SLOWLOG is essentially a stub, because (a) Geode does not 
track such data the way Redis does, but (b) if the command is not supported, 
some monitoring tools (like certain versions of the DataDog agent) can 
experience internal errors that prevent monitoring of other, fully-supported 
statistics.

            Why do we need to backport these changes?

              *   These changes will allow automated tools that monitor Redis 
health (e.g. DataDog) to also monitor the health of the Geode 
compatibility-with-Redis subsystem.
              *   If we don't backport these changes to 1.14.0 then use of 
Redis compatibility will be impaired or unacceptable for several users

            Reference PR: 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Fgeode%2Fpull%2F6131&amp;data=04%7C01%7Conichols%40vmware.com%7C24619f71c80d4d51d96c08d8e5e9baa8%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C1%7C0%7C637512139313586119%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=97K5%2Bw2U%2B8BA3cpF4wDFZSIwI97HF5%2FE8llS6kgCKhY%3D&amp;reserved=0

                    Thanks,
                    Ray Ingles



Reply via email to