Thanks for the feedback. The corresponding README and CONTRIBUTING docs have 
been updated to reflect this proposal. 

> On Feb 2, 2021, at 4:41 AM, Mario Salazar de Torres 
> <mario.salazar.de.tor...@est.tech> wrote:
> 
> Thanks for pointing out this issue. A few pointers on your proposal:
> 
>  *   On my opinion the hybrid approach is the most practical one. For our 
> case, we compile from the source each release, but it might seem reasonable 
> that patch releases maintain both ABI and API compatibility.
>  *   To make sure API and ABI compatibility it would be good to write down 
> the compatibility rules in the documentation (i.e: CONTRIBUTING.md)
>  *   Regarding future changes, I agree that there are lots of virtual methods 
> that might not need to be virtual and might be good to re-think the public 
> API for the next major release to improve it.
>  *   Also, a note on the fact that we are exporting more symbols than needed. 
> For most cases that's done this way to be able to test some features.
> So, I'd say both things are closely related and to reduce the exported 
> symbols, as well as the number of virtual methods we might need to work on 
> the testing approach.
> 
> BR/
> Mario.
> ________________________________
> From: Jacob Barrett <jabarr...@vmware.com>
> Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 4:34 PM
> To: dev@geode.apache.org <dev@geode.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [Proposal] Geode Native Library Versioning
> 
> 
> On Jan 29, 2021, at 3:47 PM, Dan Smith 
> <dasm...@vmware.com<mailto:dasm...@vmware.com>> wrote:
> I do think at least implementing some automated checking for whatever 
> compatibility we intend to provide is a good idea.
> 
> I have a branch with a test using Abigail [1]. This branch depends on merging 
> of a CI branch. It was actually through this branch that it was clear we have 
> not been good about preserving any ABI compatibility between releases. I also 
> found that we are exporting more symbols than we should in our library. All 
> these need to be addressed over time. Baby steps I supposed…
> 
> [1] 
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsourceware.org%2Flibabigail%2F&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cjabarrett%40vmware.com%7Cdef3066d7ed24b9b36c708d8c777cc99%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C637478664662167370%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=ccHSB7DnIqLP02Jv7h73SvYQ9uEcIWozFEQViA48egU%3D&amp;reserved=0
> 
> -Jake
> 

Reply via email to