Hi there Jens, No this is not intended to replace the Service loading mechanism that is currently there.
This is merely a registry that is to aid the looking up of services (like ClassLoaderService or MetricService) within the code without having to explicitly add that service onto every constructor or method call. --Udo From: Jens Deppe <jde...@vmware.com> Date: Tuesday, October 20, 2020 at 11:33 PM To: dev@geode.apache.org <dev@geode.apache.org> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] ServiceRegistry RFC Hi Udo, Is the intention of this to replace (and extend) what we're doing with the traditional service loading mechanism today? i.e. how we're loading everything that extends CacheService (for example HttpService, LuceneService, GeodeRedisService, etc.). Thanks --jens On 10/15/20, 7:25 PM, "Udo Kohlmeyer" <u...@vmware.com> wrote: Hi there Apache Geode Devs. Please find attached an RFC for the introduction of a ServiceRegistry into Apache Geode. https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FGEODE%2FServiceRegistry&data=04%7C01%7Cudo%40vmware.com%7C592a308778d744660acc08d874f466d2%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C637387940332683848%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=5SdJBoPsYXXTQiA0B%2BJDyB38wGnyNhGDa8ePunAKKdQ%3D&reserved=0 Please add all comments to the RFC to this email for tracking and discussion. --Udo