To think a little more left field, with our continued investment in K8’s, maybe we can look into that area? Run tests in parallel using K8’s?
But I am also supportive of fixing the tests that we can run them in parallel without the extra container scaffolding. —Udo On Jul 1, 2020, 11:38 AM -0700, Jacob Barrett <jabarr...@vmware.com>, wrote: On Jul 1, 2020, at 11:14 AM, Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org> wrote: I'm not a big fan of forking the Docker plugin and making it a new Geode submodule. This approach kind of flies in the face of the intentions of OSS in general. For example, we want folks contributing to Apache Geode rather than forking Geode to create their own new project while never giving back to this project. If the original Docker plugin project refuses to maintain or take on new contributors then some of us should help lead the creation of a new Docker plugin repo in Github that is independent of Apache Geode. This way it becomes a new living Docker plugin project that many contributors can become involved in. It also becomes valuable to more projects than just one. I've seen this happen with a number of OSS projects in which the original maintainer of a project disappears or leaves and I think this is generally accepted as the best approach for reviving a dead project that no new committers can be added to. I agree, if we want to keep using the plugin it does make sense to open source the fork outside of Geode. -Jake
