It looks like we have consensus to move forward with this proposal. Thanks all for your comments! I've moved it into "In Development"
Thanks, -Dan On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 4:47 PM Aaron Lindsey <aaronlind...@apache.org> wrote: > This proposal sounds good to me. +1 to using standard security > implementation based on TLS > > > On Apr 1, 2020, at 3:20 PM, Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > > >> When we move from a reliable UDP implementation to one based on TCP, we > >> need to think about how to provide reliability on top of TCP. If you > dig > >> into TCP, you’ll find that it tries really hard (sometimes up to 15 > >> minutes!!) but doesn’t guarantee message delivery. Does this matter in > >> practice? Yes it does--I’ve worked on geode issues where a faulty > network > >> cable eventually caused a cluster hang because of a dropped TCP packet. > >> > > > > +1. Yes, we are proposing that the new messenger needs to be able to > > recreate the TCP connection and resend any unacked messages. > > > > -Dan > >
