Recently some Geode users have expressed concern that shiro-1.4.1.jar is 
getting flagged for critical security vulnerability CVE-2020-1957.

Analysis shows that Geode does not use Shiro in a manner that would expose this 
vulnerability, so maybe there is no need to backport GEODE-7941.

The risk of bringing GEODE-7941 is very low (Shiro 1.5.2 has no API changes or 
other breaking changes relative to 1.4.1; Shiro rolled its minor version only 
to make JDK 8 the minimum).  GEODE-7941 has passed all tests on develop.

I am happy to go either way here, so putting it to a vote.  Does 'making Geode 
1.12 look better to automated vulnerability scans' qualify as a ‘critical fix’? 
 A big red flag doesn’t make a good first impression…also it’s not easy for a 
user to discover for themselves that Geode is not actually vulnerable.  
Bringing this fix to support/1.12 might bolster users’ confidence in the Geode 
community and our new support-branch model.

-Owen

Reply via email to