> > So the "restore redundancy" command is blocking and only returns when the > operation is finished?
That's correct. The intention is to ensure that redundancy is recovered before other commands can be issued. On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 6:33 PM Jinmei Liao <jil...@vmware.com.invalid> wrote: > So the "restore redundancy" command is blocking and only returns when the > operation is finished? > > On 3/30/20, 2:21 PM, "Kirk Lund" <kl...@apache.org> wrote: > > [I added this as a comment on the wiki page] > > You might want to consider making RestoreRedundancyOperation actually > extend CompletableFuture. The interface is already very similar to > Future, > and if you extend CompletableFuture, then the user of the API can > easily > combine it with other CompletableFutures. It also helps push us in a > direction of standardizing on Future/CompletableFuture for APIs that > involve asynchronous computation. > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 11:47 AM Donal Evans <doev...@pivotal.io> > wrote: > > > Hey everyone, > > > > An RFC for adding gfsh commands to allow users to restore redundancy > to > > partitioned regions and to easily check the redundancy status of > > partitioned regions has been posted: > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FGEODE%2FRedundancy%2BGfsh%2BCommands&data=02%7C01%7Cjiliao%40vmware.com%7C788c44ed12d84851d7a708d7d4f042d7%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C637212000696424012&sdata=MrrGhRXEyu5PONoK4ID1HTNpBdLYCkkiYOzcwcY%2BUjs%3D&reserved=0 > > . > > > > Please review and comment on this RFC by Monday, 04/06/2020. > > > > Please also note that this RFC has been revised from an earlier draft > > version that some of you may have seen, so the content may have > changed. > > > > Thanks, > > Donal > > > > >
