Seems like I'm the only one on this thread who even quibbled about removing
the limit entirely. Let's go ahead and remove the limit.

-Dan

On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 8:26 AM Robert Houghton <rhough...@pivotal.io>
wrote:

> I want the check to stay required for PR merges to be allowed. I also want
> it to do real work in all cases. If I can add whitespace to 25 test classes
> and get a free pass, thats a big testing hole.
>
> Remove the limit. Worst case, we have to A) bump timeouts in the future B)
> put the limits back in C) come up with a new paradigm for verifying test
> quality in a non-deterministic process
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 8:58 PM Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>
> > I checked, and 1% of our last 500 commits touched more than 30 tests. Of
> > those 1%, over half touched more than 100 tests. So I'd guess somewhere
> > around .5% of prs will fall under the proposed changes.
> >
> > My preference would be to just raise the threshold given that we already
> > raised the timeout. That'll catch 99% of prs without making test
> > refactoring and cleanups that touch many tests hard.
> >
> > But, I'm ok with removing the limit if people really feel that a manual
> > override process is better for that 1%.
> >
> > -Dan
> > On Tue, Mar 10, 2020, 4:33 PM Owen Nichols <onich...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> >
> > > To recap, the original question was: should we change StressNewTest to
> > > pass ONLY if it is able to successfully run all new/changed tests 50
> > times
> > > (eliminating the existing loophole exempting PRs that touch 25 or more
> > > files)?
> > >
> > > So far a handful of people have expressed support, but many have
> > > questions/concerns:
> > > - One concern was mis-counting of test files touched.  As of today this
> > is
> > > now fixed.
> > > - A big concern was that it might become more difficult to pass all
> > > required PR checks.
> > > - Another concern was that the current timeout of 6 hours might be too
> > > high / too low.
> > > - An alternative was suggested to keep the loophole but maybe increase
> > the
> > > threshold required to get the free pass.
> > > - If we’re going to raise the bar on any required PR check, maybe we
> > > should consider making it non-required.
> > >
> > > Let’s extend the comment period until the end of next week (Friday Mar
> > 20)
> > > in hopes of converging on a solution everybody is happy with (even if
> it
> > > isn’t what was originally proposed).
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Mar 6, 2020, at 4:51 PM, Donal Evans <doev...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > With fairly apt timing, we've recently had a PR merged (
> > > > https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/4745) that introduced a test
> that
> > > has
> > > > resulted in fairly consistently flaky failures in the pipeline (JIRA
> > > > ticket:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/GEODE/issues/GEODE-7843
> > > ).
> > > > The PR was quite large and touched/created a lot of tests, so
> > > StressNewTest
> > > > never ran on it:
> > > > https://concourse.apachegeode-ci.info/builds/136784#L5e3ac3fc:2.
> Given
> > > how
> > > > frequently the test is failing in the pipeline (11 failures on
> various
> > > > IntegrationTest jobs over the past 6 commits), it seems very likely
> > that
> > > > had StressNewTest been allowed to run, this issue would have been
> > caught
> > > at
> > > > the PR stage and could have been remedied then, instead of resulting
> > in a
> > > > nearly constantly red pipeline.
> > > >
> > > > I've already given my +1 to this proposal, but this situation has
> > > prompted
> > > > me to make it a +2.
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 1:46 PM Donal Evans <doev...@pivotal.io>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> With fairly apt timing, we've recently had a PR merged (
> > > >> https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/4745) that introduced a test
> > that
> > > >> has resulted in fairly consistently flaky failures in the pipeline
> > (JIRA
> > > >> ticket:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/GEODE/issues/GEODE-7843
> > > ).
> > > >> The PR was quite large and touched/created a lot of tests, so
> > > StressNewTest
> > > >> never ran on it:
> > > >> https://concourse.apachegeode-ci.info/builds/136784#L5e3ac3fc:2.
> > Given
> > > >> how frequently the test is failing in the pipeline (11 failures on
> > > various
> > > >> IntegrationTest jobs over the past 6 commits), it seems very likely
> > that
> > > >> had StressNewTest been allowed to run, this issue would have been
> > > caught at
> > > >> the PR stage and could have been remedied then, instead of resulting
> > in
> > > a
> > > >> nearly constantly red pipeline.
> > > >>
> > > >> I've already given my +1 to this proposal, but this situation has
> > > prompted
> > > >> me to make it a *+1*.
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 2:08 PM Anilkumar Gingade <
> aging...@pivotal.io
> > >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> The stress test is to identify the flaky-ness within the test; and
> > > >>> assuming
> > > >>> any changes to the test may have introduced the flaky-ness.
> > > >>> It's about paying the cost upfront or later when the test is
> > > determined to
> > > >>> be flaky.
> > > >>> If 25+ tests have been changed in a PR, the cost of running stress
> > test
> > > >>> for
> > > >>> those;  and gating the PR for so long.
> > > >>> Knowing how much pain it causes to fix a flaky test after a
> > > certain/long
> > > >>> duration of time; I am +1 for doing this change.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 10:06 AM Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io>
> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> What's the current timeout for StressNewTest? Maybe if we just up
> > the
> > > >>>> threshold to 100 tests or so and up the timeout to match we can
> > catch
> > > >>>> pretty much all PRs.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I'm not sure why the job is flagging more tests than it should. It
> > > looks
> > > >>>> like at some point @rhoughon changed it to read the merge base
> from
> > > some
> > > >>>> file created by concourse as an optimization [1] - I suspect maybe
> > > that
> > > >>>> file is inaccurate?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I originally wrote this job. It's definitely not a panacea, it
> will
> > > only
> > > >>>> catch a new flaky test if
> > > >>>> - the test is really flaky (likely to fail more than 1/50 times)
> > > >>>> - the change actually happened in the test file itself, and not
> the
> > > >>>> product or some other test file.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> [1]
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/geode/commit/4c06ba4625e69d44a5165aa9f2fccddfc064de87
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> -Dan
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Sun, Mar 1, 2020 at 9:00 PM Owen Nichols <onich...@pivotal.io>
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> We don’t tend to look too closely at successful PR checks to see
> > > >>> whether
> > > >>>>> they actually checked anything at all.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> One example I found is
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > >
> >
> https://concourse.apachegeode-ci.info/teams/main/pipelines/apache-develop-pr/jobs/StressNewTestOpenJDK11/builds/5957
> > > >>>>> <
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > >
> >
> https://concourse.apachegeode-ci.info/teams/main/pipelines/apache-develop-pr/jobs/StressNewTestOpenJDK11/builds/5957
> > > >>>>>> :
> > > >>>>> 32 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Here are 92 more examples (url’s omitted for brevity — use the
> > > example
> > > >>>>> above as a template and just replace the last 4 digits):
> > > >>>>> 26 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6243)
> > > >>>>> 26 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6249)
> > > >>>>> 26 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6402)
> > > >>>>> 27 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6262)
> > > >>>>> 27 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6430)
> > > >>>>> 27 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6439)
> > > >>>>> 27 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6449)
> > > >>>>> 27 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6454)
> > > >>>>> 27 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6458)
> > > >>>>> 27 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6459)
> > > >>>>> 28 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6224)
> > > >>>>> 28 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6441)
> > > >>>>> 28 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6448)
> > > >>>>> 28 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6452)
> > > >>>>> 29 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6102)
> > > >>>>> 29 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6177)
> > > >>>>> 30 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 5939)
> > > >>>>> 30 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 5940)
> > > >>>>> 30 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 5949)
> > > >>>>> 30 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6473)
> > > >>>>> 31 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 5953)
> > > >>>>> 31 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6187)
> > > >>>>> 31 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6470)
> > > >>>>> 31 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6471)
> > > >>>>> 31 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6474)
> > > >>>>> 31 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6475)
> > > >>>>> 32 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 5958)
> > > >>>>> 32 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6173)
> > > >>>>> 32 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6236)
> > > >>>>> 32 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6237)
> > > >>>>> 32 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6242)
> > > >>>>> 33 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6246)
> > > >>>>> 33 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6248)
> > > >>>>> 33 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6250)
> > > >>>>> 33 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6251)
> > > >>>>> 33 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6254)
> > > >>>>> 33 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6255)
> > > >>>>> 34 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6139)
> > > >>>>> 34 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6141)
> > > >>>>> 34 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6264)
> > > >>>>> 34 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6266)
> > > >>>>> 34 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6271)
> > > >>>>> 35 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6142)
> > > >>>>> 35 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6143)
> > > >>>>> 35 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6277)
> > > >>>>> 35 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6309)
> > > >>>>> 35 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6413)
> > > >>>>> 35 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6414)
> > > >>>>> 35 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6419)
> > > >>>>> 35 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6420)
> > > >>>>> 36 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6144)
> > > >>>>> 36 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6146)
> > > >>>>> 36 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6147)
> > > >>>>> 36 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6310)
> > > >>>>> 36 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6326)
> > > >>>>> 36 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6329)
> > > >>>>> 36 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6330)
> > > >>>>> 40 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6159)
> > > >>>>> 40 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6160)
> > > >>>>> 40 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6188)
> > > >>>>> 41 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6440)
> > > >>>>> 41 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6480)
> > > >>>>> 41 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6483)
> > > >>>>> 43 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6190)
> > > >>>>> 44 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 5768)
> > > >>>>> 44 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 5772)
> > > >>>>> 46 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6191)
> > > >>>>> 46 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6218)
> > > >>>>> 46 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6219)
> > > >>>>> 46 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6225)
> > > >>>>> 46 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6244)
> > > >>>>> 46 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6245)
> > > >>>>> 48 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6129)
> > > >>>>> 49 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 5804)
> > > >>>>> 51 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 5877)
> > > >>>>> 53 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 5742)
> > > >>>>> 54 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 5757)
> > > >>>>> 66 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6232)
> > > >>>>> 66 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6233)
> > > >>>>> 66 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6234)
> > > >>>>> 66 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6259)
> > > >>>>> 66 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6260)
> > > >>>>> 66 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6278)
> > > >>>>> 79 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job to
> > > pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6481)
> > > >>>>> 103 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job
> to
> > > >>> pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6493)
> > > >>>>> 106 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job
> to
> > > >>> pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6206)
> > > >>>>> 106 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job
> to
> > > >>> pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6207)
> > > >>>>> 115 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job
> to
> > > >>> pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 5769)
> > > >>>>> 118 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job
> to
> > > >>> pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6226)
> > > >>>>> 721 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job
> to
> > > >>> pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6197)
> > > >>>>> 722 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job
> to
> > > >>> pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6217)
> > > >>>>> 722 is too many changed tests to stress test. Allowing this job
> to
> > > >>> pass
> > > >>>>> without stress testing.  (build 6221)
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Please note, sometimes the number of files reported seems to be
> way
> > > >>>> higher
> > > >>>>> than it should be.  For example
> > > >>>> https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/4691
> > > >>>>> <https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/4691> shows exactly 1 test
> > > file
> > > >>>>> touched, but
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > >
> >
> https://concourse.apachegeode-ci.info/teams/main/pipelines/apache-develop-pr/jobs/StressNewTestOpenJDK11/builds/6278
> > > >>>>> <
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > >
> >
> https://concourse.apachegeode-ci.info/teams/main/pipelines/apache-develop-pr/jobs/StressNewTestOpenJDK11/builds/6278
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> thinks it touched 66 test files.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> There’s currently no good data to predict how long StressNew will
> > > >>> take,
> > > >>>> it
> > > >>>>> just depends on the mix of tests touched.  I am aware of at
> least 4
> > > >>> cases
> > > >>>>> (with less than 25 files) where the timeout was hit.  In two of
> > those
> > > >>>> cases
> > > >>>>> we re-ran with a longer timeout, and in two cases the PR author
> > split
> > > >>> up
> > > >>>>> the PR into half a dozen smaller PRs to get around it.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On Mar 1, 2020, at 7:52 PM, Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io>
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> What percentage of PR’s are currently subject to the 25 test
> file
> > > >>> rule?
> > > >>>>> How many would be subject to the concourse timeout?
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> I’d like to understand the scope of the impact for this change.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Anthony
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> On Mar 1, 2020, at 8:58 AM, Owen Nichols <onich...@pivotal.io>
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Impossible, no. Inconvenient, perhaps, but a small price to pay
> > for
> > > >>>>> being
> > > >>>>>>> able to trust that green means green.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> With or without this proposed change, if anyone is having
> trouble
> > > >>>>> getting
> > > >>>>>>> their PR to pass StressNew, please bring it up on the dev list
> > and
> > > >>> we
> > > >>>>> can
> > > >>>>>>> discuss the appropriate solution on a case-by-case basis (e.g.
> > > >>>>> increasing
> > > >>>>>>> timeout, fixing the logic that identifies changed test files,
> > > >>>> splitting
> > > >>>>>>> into multiple PRs, authorizing an override, etc).
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 1, 2020 at 8:56 AM Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io>
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Won't this make it impossible to merge refactoring changes
> that
> > > >>> touch
> > > >>>>> a lot
> > > >>>>>>>> of tests?
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> -Dan
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 29, 2020, 12:37 PM Robert Houghton <
> > > >>> rhough...@pivotal.io
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Yes, as it should
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 29, 2020, 12:25 Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io>
> > wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Doesn't the build fail when concourse times out?
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to