+1 If we get to 200, the refactor implements itself, right?
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 1:57 PM Jason Huynh <jhu...@pivotal.io> wrote: > +1 > I think we are now at +114 thanks to jinmei's 100 ;-) > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 1:50 PM Mark Bretl <mbr...@apache.org> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 12:55 PM Nabarun Nag <n...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 12:51 PM Charlie Black <cbl...@pivotal.io> > > wrote: > > > > > > > this proposal == awesome sauce > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 11:24 AM Robert Houghton < > rhough...@pivotal.io > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > Do we want to restart from my lazy POC from a few months ago? > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019, 08:40 Jens Deppe <jensde...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hello All, > > > > > > > > > > > > We'd like to propose moving gfsh and all associated commands into > > its > > > > own > > > > > > gradle submodule (implicitly thus also producing a separate maven > > > > > > artifact). The underlying intent is to decouple geode core from > any > > > > > Spring > > > > > > dependencies. > > > > > > > > > > > > The proposal is outlined here: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Move+gfsh+code+to+a+separate+gradle+sub-project > > > > > > > > > > > > Please provide feedback for this proposal *on this email thread* > > and > > > > not > > > > > in > > > > > > the comment section of the proposal page. > > > > > > > > > > > > The deadline for this proposal will be Monday, December 2. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance for feedback / comments. > > > > > > > > > > > > --Jens & Patrick > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Charlie Black | cbl...@pivotal.io > > > > > > > > > >
