I can see that the AEQ pause feature was previously discussed and approved: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9b5f5c58e1b298d9d0ca870a0deec06f7344a60809790c75a5f68bfa@%3Cdev.geode.apache.org%3E <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9b5f5c58e1b298d9d0ca870a0deec06f7344a60809790c75a5f68bfa@%3Cdev.geode.apache.org%3E>
However I don’t see any discussion or approval for the proposal to include "GEODE-7261: Include spring-core in the geode-web war artifact”: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5b1a20fc287bf0322257da3b8d22d56b968730419627dd08f93146f0@%3Cdev.geode.apache.org%3E <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5b1a20fc287bf0322257da3b8d22d56b968730419627dd08f93146f0@%3Cdev.geode.apache.org%3E> If Spring 5 pairs with SDG 2.2.0, then it should be easy to make a proposal for why GEODE-7261 is a critical fix and within the theme of 1.9.2. I’d just like to see a discussion and vote for every fix backported into the release branch. -Owen > On Oct 4, 2019, at 6:46 AM, Jens Deppe <jde...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > Hello Geode Dev Community, > > We have created a new release branch for Apache Geode 1.9.2 - "release/1.9.2" > > > This branch currently includes the following commits: > > > GEODE-7124: Fixing tests for older version > GEODE-7204: Add changes to AEQ documentation for > 'pause-event-processing' functionality (#4053) > GEODE-7179: alter async queue command to change state of event > processor during creation (#4057) > GEODE-7128: APIs and GFSH commands to resume AEQ processing. (#4056) > GEODE-7149: Changes to support AsyncEventQueue's dispatcher status > with AsyncEventQueue beans (#4029) > GEODE-7127: Fixing the list AEQ command. > GEODE-7127: Added gfsh arguments for starting AEQ with paused event > processing. > GEODE-7126: Refactoring API names to be more consistent. > GEODE-7129: Adding XML config for creating AEQ with paused event processing. > GEODE-7126: Added new API to resume AEQ event processing > GEODE-7124: Added new API to create AEQ with paused event processing > GEODE-7261: Include spring-core in the geode-web war artifact > > Please do review and raise any concern with the release branch. > If no concerns are raised, we will start with the voting for the > release candidate soon. > > Regards > --Jens
