+1 On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 6:36 PM Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> Hi, > > I'd like to propose including the fixes for GEODE-7085 into 1.10 (SHA's > below). This is not a new issue, but it does result not being able to > recover from disk without this fix if a cluster has more than 2 billion > updates to a single bucket from a single member. > > SHAs: f587101 , f17931bf > > Thanks, > -Dan > -- Juan José Ramos Cassella Senior Software Engineer Email: jra...@pivotal.io
