> On Jun 24, 2019, at 3:42 PM, Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io> wrote: > >> >> Just to make sure I got this 100% right, you mean the work related as part >> of the proposal would be under development, correct? > > > Yes! And I like your suggestion to just create a couple of buckets on the > wiki, rather than one for each state. Will moving the page around on the wiki result in dead links to the draft version? -Jake
- [DISCUSS] RFC 0: Lightweight RFC Process Alexander Murmann
- Re: [DISCUSS] RFC 0: Lightweight RFC Process Alexander Murmann
- Re: [DISCUSS] RFC 0: Lightweight RFC Process Dan Smith
- Re: [DISCUSS] RFC 0: Lightweight RFC Proces... Alexander Murmann
- Re: [DISCUSS] RFC 0: Lightweight RFC Pr... Dan Smith
- Re: [DISCUSS] RFC 0: Lightweight R... Jacob Barrett
- Re: [DISCUSS] RFC 0: Lightweig... Aaron Lindsey
- Re: [DISCUSS] RFC 0: Lightweig... Dan Smith
- Re: [DISCUSS] RFC 0: Light... Alexander Murmann
- Re: [DISCUSS] RFC 0: Light... Dan Smith
- Re: [DISCUSS] RFC 0: Light... Mark Hanson
- Re: [DISCUSS] RFC 0: Light... Alexander Murmann
- Re: [DISCUSS] RFC 0: Light... Aaron Lindsey
- Re: [DISCUSS] RFC 0: Light... Udo Kohlmeyer
- Re: [DISCUSS] RFC 0: Light... Dan Smith
- Re: [DISCUSS] RFC 0: Light... Dale Emery