As this changes the behavior on the existing older application; it seems to break the backward compatibility requirements. We use client versions to keep the contracts/behavior same for older client; can we do the same here.
-Anil. On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 8:33 AM Darrel Schneider <dschnei...@pivotal.io> wrote: > Is it okay, in a minor release, to implement Region.getStatistics for > partitioned regions? See GEODE-2685. The current behavior is for it to > always throw UnsupportedOperationException. I doubt that any application is > depending on that behavior but it could be. I know we have seen changes > like this in the past break the tests of other products that are layered on > top of Geode. > Should this type of change be considered one that breaks backwards > compatibility? >
