Good question! I think we intentionally left the default branch as master so that users cloning the examples from github will get examples that work against a released version of geode.
That said, I don't feel too strongly if we would rather make things more consistent with the geode repo - it seems like we also try to keep develop stable. -Dan On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 9:07 AM Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote: > Alexander noticed that some recent PR’s against the geode-examples repo > made against the master branch. That breaks the gitflow approach where > only released code is on master. Should we update the default branch to be > develop? > > > Anthony > >
