+1 for lowering SPAM On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 9:19 PM, Jacob Barrett <jbarr...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> Must we get spammed with every thing that happens? It seems to me a log in > GitHub, JIRA and email is obscene. > > All this email we get now just gets bulk deleted and I often miss > important conversations. If we move it all to another email group and > nobody registers for it then what’s the point. I say let the GitHub and > JIRA logs stay where they are and leave email for real conversations. > > -Jake > > > > On Aug 23, 2018, at 8:15 PM, Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > > > AFAICT, PR comments are added to the JIRA worklog but only JIRA comments > are sent to issues@g.a.o <mailto:issues@g.a.o>. > > > >> On Aug 23, 2018, at 8:10 PM, Jacob Barrett <jbarr...@pivotal.io> wrote: > >> > >> I am pretty sure all PRs are logged to JIRA and then emailed from JIRA. > >> > >>> On Aug 23, 2018, at 8:06 PM, Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> I read a lot of PR emails from Geode, but I was noticing that those > are not being archived on a public Geode mailing list. Is that correct? > >>> > >>> I suggest we create a notifications@g.a.o mailing list to make sure > all discussion on PR’s is archived on an ASF mailing list. This pattern > has been adopted by several other ASF projects, see [1][2] for example. > >>> > >>> Thoughts? I’m happy to followup with INFRA if y’all agree. > >>> > >>> Anthony > >>> > >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16330 > >>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14730 > >>> > > >
