A separate pipeline would work too. Maybe we could even create multiple DistributedTest jobs to run in parallel that way.... We'd want to create some metrics jobs for that separate pipeline for sure.
-Dan On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 4:53 PM, Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote: > What do you think about making a separate pipeline for this? > > Anthony > > > > On Jul 5, 2018, at 4:50 PM, Alexander Murmann <amurm...@pivotal.io> > wrote: > > > > Sounds like a great idea. > > > > I particularly like running it on CI a bunch because it should identify > > flaky tests and flaky product issues, but also might find problematic > > interactions with how we run on CI. > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 4:40 PM, Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > > >> We seem to keep hitting intermittent failures in DistributedTest in our > >> concourse pipeline. > >> > >> I'd like to increase the frequency that DistributedTest runs in order to > >> shake out more flaky tests. With concourse we should be able to trigger > >> this job on a timer so that it is running continuously. > >> > >> What do you all think about this plan? It means more runs to analyze, > but > >> it should us help clean up this job in the long run. > >> > >> -Dan > >> > >
