I've pulled, done a clean build, recreated my IntelliJ project and still
see this compilation error in buildSrc:

/Users/klund/dev/gemfire_CLEAN/open/buildSrc/src/test/
java/org/apache/geode/javac/TestCompiler.java
Error:(40, 23) java: cannot find symbol
  symbol:   class EnsureCorrectRunsWithProcessor
  location: class org.apache.geode.javac.TestCompiler

Any idea how to resolve this? (projects with a revision prior to the Gradle
upgrade don't hit this error)

On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 11:55 AM, Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io> wrote:

> Intellij should now build geode just fine with the default gradle settings
> as of 226e406.  If you followed these instructions to uncheck "Create
> separate modules per source" to get things working last week you might want
> to reimport the gradle project with the default settings.
>
> -Dan
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 2:40 PM, Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > After the recent Gradle upgrade, you might see some compilation errors
> in
> > > IntelliJ involving geode-pulse such as the following:
> > >
> > > /Users/klund/dev/gemfire/open/geode-pulse/src/main/java/org/
> > > apache/geode/tools/pulse/internal/service/MemberDetailsService.java
> > > Error:(28, 46) java: package org.springframework.context.annotation
> does
> > > not exist
> > > Error:(29, 38) java: package org.springframework.stereotype does not
> > exist
> > > Error:(30, 38) java: package org.springframework.stereotype does not
> > exist
> > > Error:(42, 2) java: cannot find symbol
> > >   symbol: class Component
> > > Error:(43, 2) java: cannot find symbol
> > >   symbol: class Service
> > > Error:(44, 2) java: cannot find symbol
> > >   symbol: class Scope
> > >
> > > To resolve this, open:
> > >
> > > Preferences -> Build, Execution, Deployment -> BuildTools -> Gradle
> > >
> > > There you’ll see your Geode project under the “Linked Gradle projects”
> —
> > > you need to select it and then deselect “Create separate module per
> > source
> > > set.”
> > >
> > > This worked for me.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Kirk
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to