Sounds good to me. +1

Thanks,
Mark
> On Dec 27, 2017, at 9:17 AM, Jacob Barrett <jbarr...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> 
> As we move more and more to C++11 the use of templates and header only
> implementations balloons. For many of these templates to be useful some
> internal utilities must be provided to them but should not be "exposed" as
> public API themselves. Many large scale projects have similar issues as
> more and more is implemented in the headers. Boost for example uses the
> ::detail namespace to designate internal only types and methods. I would
> like to propose that we do something similar. To be consistent with our
> Java brothers I would suggest apache::geode::client::internal namespace and
> headers located in the include/geode/internal directory.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> -Jake

Reply via email to