Hi Jason
​,

Thanks for the comments!

Regarding the talk, i'm not completely sure but i believe that as a part of
the S1P conference the sessions will be recorded.

>>
Also for question 1. Would you be interested to have the adapter as part of
​ ​
Geode's code ecosystem?
​> ​
Do you mean to create a module in Geode for this adapter?  Would it make
​ ​
sense to add a Geode module to Calcite?  Were you wanting a tighter
​ ​
integration (beyond an adapter) with Calcite within
​ ​
Geode?

Currently the adapter is implemented as a pure Geode client using only the
public Geode API/OQL. ​There are no dependencies from Geode to the adapter!

​1. If the adapter became one of Calcite project adapter (
https://calcite.apache.org/docs/adapter.html) ​it will benefit from being
up to date with latest Calcite developments. But IMO this might not the
most important driving force for evolving the adapter.
​2. If it became an "extension" project/module under Geode's project
umbrella ​it will stay closer to it potential users and will evolve with
their needs. Hopefully it may attract more contributors if found useful.

Personally I would be interested to explore further the approach and figure
out what are its strengths and weaknesses.

- Cheers,
Christian


On 13 November 2017 at 19:46, Jason Huynh <jhu...@pivotal.io> wrote:

> Hi Christian,
>
> I don't know much about Calcite and haven't had a chance to try out your
> adapter yet but it sounds like a neat idea.  Will your talk be recorded and
> available after the Summit?
>
> Also for question 1. Would you be interested to have the adapter as part of
> Geode's code ecosystem?
> Do you mean to create a module in Geode for this adapter?  Would it make
> sense to add a Geode module to Calcite?  Were you wanting a tighter
> integration (beyond an adapter) with Calcite within Geode?
>
> -Jason
>
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 3:49 AM Christian Tzolov <ctzo...@pivotal.io>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've been working lately on Apache Calcite SQL/JDBC adapter for Apache
> > Geode [1].
> >
> > Adapter's current implementation act as a plain Geode client (using the
> > public API/OQL interfaces) trying to push down to Geode OQL as many
> > relational expressions as it can. Relational expressions not supported by
> > OQL are executed by the adapter itself.
> >
> > While this approach has its advantages and disadvantages, which I will
> try
> > to address at my Geode Summit talk [2] I would like to ask two question:
> >
> > 1. Would you be interested to have the adapter as part of Geode's code
> > ecosystem?
> >
> > 2. I am aware (an experienced it myself) the SQLFire story. But given
> that
> > OQL features are expanding (aggregations are are already supported) and
> > that tools like Calcite offer proper logical/physical (cost based) planer
> > and SQL extensions such as SQL streaming, would it be useful to discuss
> > what novel approaches for using SQL/JDBC with Geode are possible?
> >
> > (Julian Hyde - founder of Calcite - is in cc)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Christian
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/tzolov/calcite/tree/geode-1.3
> > [2]
> >
> > https://springoneplatform.io/sessions/enable-sql-jdbc-
> access-to-apache-geode-gemfire-using-apache-calcite
> >
> >
> > --
> > Christian Tzolov <http://www.linkedin.com/in/tzolov> | Principle
> Software
> > Engineer | Pivotal <http://pivotal.io/> | ctzo...@pivotal.io |
> +31610285517
> > <+31%206%2010285517>
> >
>



-- 
Christian Tzolov <http://www.linkedin.com/in/tzolov> | Principle Software
Engineer | Pivotal <http://pivotal.io/> | ctzo...@pivotal.io |+31610285517

Reply via email to