Here's an updated link to the properties spreadsheet that should have wider viewability:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1C2D7cpcYMy5bd0aXXReJn6wWsBuLZrCegl7_cevvKo0/edit?usp=sharing On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Dave Barnes <dbar...@pivotal.io> wrote: > There's no single list of "all properties". Here's one that Tech Pubs last > reviewed about 6 months ago... > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1C2D7cpcYMy5bd0aXXReJn6wWsBuLZ > rCegl7_cevvKo0/edit#gid=0 > > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Bruce Schuchardt <bschucha...@pivotal.io > > wrote: > >> There are plenty of places besides DistributionConfig that use "gemfire" >> prefixed system properties and there are now also places that use "geode" >> prefixed system properties. I think the whole mess needs to be managed and >> allow either prefix, or even as someone suggested making it plug-able. >> There is also an HTML file that, now out of date, lists most of these >> system properties. >> >> >> >> On 9/14/17 10:14 AM, Darrel Schneider wrote: >> >>> +1 to having DistributionConfig look for both the "gemfire." and "geode." >>> prefixes. >>> +1 to having DistributionConfig look for both a "gemfire.properties" and >>> "geode.properties" file. >>> Since the geode flavors are newer it should look for them first and only >>> look for the old gemfire flavor if a geode one is not found. >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> That's a bigger change and I'm not sure how you would handle backwards >>>> compatibility for users using gemfire.properties. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Jacob Barrett <jbarr...@pivotal.io> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Or better yet, we stop using properties files already. >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 8:55 AM Dave Barnes <dbar...@pivotal.io> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Is there a possibility that the code might find its way into additional >>>>>> contexts with other names? If so, perhaps we should consider a more >>>>>> >>>>> generic >>>>> >>>>>> identifier, such as PRODUCT_PREFIX. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 4:42 AM, Dinesh Akhand <dines...@amdocs.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why we are keeping gemfire in current geode 1.2 , Can we replace this >>>>>>> >>>>>> with >>>>>> >>>>>>> GEODE >>>>>>> File : DistributionConfig.java >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Current code: >>>>>>> String GEMFIRE_PREFIX = "gemfire."; >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Suggestion to change: >>>>>>> String GEODE_PREFIX = "geode."; >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why do you think ? >>>>>>> Can we go ahead and change this ? >>>>>>> It will impact lots of files & all configuration will be now using >>>>>>> >>>>>> with >>>> >>>>> geode. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Dinesh Akhand >>>>>>> This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and >>>>>>> confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer < >>>>>>> https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >
