----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/62180/#review184922 -----------------------------------------------------------
This review is confusing. It requires the fix for GEODE-3557 which currently has its own PR (see https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/763). So why did you submit this review? It looks like you just grabbed one line from that PR since it has also has the change. I just wanted to make clear you should not checkin this code review because in your code base DM.getCache() does not exist. - Darrel Schneider On Sept. 7, 2017, 5:43 p.m., xiaojian zhou wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/62180/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Sept. 7, 2017, 5:43 p.m.) > > > Review request for geode, Barry Oglesby and Dan Smith. > > > Bugs: GEODE-3557 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-3557 > > > Repository: geode > > > Description > ------- > > use dm.getCache() instead > > > Diffs > ----- > > > geode-lucene/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/cache/lucene/internal/DestroyLuceneIndexMessage.java > 9eada5b20 > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/62180/diff/1/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > xiaojian zhou > >
