> On Aug. 23, 2017, 9:29 a.m., Hitesh Khamesra wrote:
> > geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/internal/cache/tier/sockets/GenericProtocolServerConnection.java
> > Line 68 (original), 72 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/61829/diff/1/?file=1801929#file1801929line72>
> >
> >     Will this warning be printed every time when we close the socket?
> 
> Bruce Schuchardt wrote:
>     When the socket is closed we get a null message from Protobuf and 
> translate that into an EOFException

so, no we won't print this warning.  That's the purpose of this change & it is 
also what the old client interface does.


- Bruce


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/61829/#review183616
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Aug. 22, 2017, 4:41 p.m., Bruce Schuchardt wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/61829/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 22, 2017, 4:41 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for geode, Alexander Murmann, Galen O'Sullivan, Hitesh 
> Khamesra, Udo Kohlmeyer, and Brian Rowe.
> 
> 
> Bugs: GEODE-3408
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-3408
> 
> 
> Repository: geode
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Modified the message handler to catch EOFException and effect shutdown of the 
> connection & server thread.  I also fixed the handling of IOException.
> 
> The methods invoked are the same as for the old protocol's handling of 
> EOFException and IOException.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/internal/cache/tier/sockets/GenericProtocolServerConnection.java
>  cd1647a 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/61829/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> as this just affects logging behavior there are no new unit tests.  I 
> verified that the behavior is correct with the manual test used to reproduce 
> GEODE-3409 (my other review that is currently open).
> 
> precheckin is running now.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bruce Schuchardt
> 
>

Reply via email to