Hi Jinmei,
1. Yes, a parallel change would be good for keystore. In both cases, we
need to specify the default. My sample text said empty string ('') -- is
that correct, or is the default JKS?
2 & 3: Good - glad they're correct. I wasn't sure, just noticed the
patterns.
-Dave

On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Jinmei Liao <jil...@pivotal.io> wrote:

>
>
> > On Aug. 3, 2017, 11:36 p.m., Dave Barnes wrote:
> > > 1. The help message for the property should state what it does and
> whether it has a default. JKS was our assumption in the past, but with the
> introduction of this feature other values (such as 'pkcs12') are possible.
> > > Current wording: "For Java truststore file format, this property has
> the value jks (or JKS)."
> > > Suggested wording: "Specifies the type of the ssl truststore. The
> default is '' (an empty string) For Java truststore format, specify 'jks'
> or 'JKS'."
> > >
> > > The following questions come from me reading for patterns, please
> forgive if they're stupid ones:
> > >
> > > 2. In configureLegacyClusterSSL (and ..ServerSSL and ..JMXSSL and
> ..ServiceSSL), I see two occurrences of "sslConfig.setTruststoreType(
> getDistributionConfig().getClusterSSLKeyStoreType());". Should the second
> one in each case be getClusterSSLTrustStoreType() ?
> > >
> > > 3. In DistributionConfigImpl.java, there's a long list of static
> imports for gateway, http, jmx, etc. KEYSTORE_TYPE is included for each
> group, but not TRUSTSTORE_TYPE. Is this correct?
>
> 1. I am simply copying from the ssl-keystore-type, should this suggested
> description also apply to the keystore as well?
> 2. the truststore type does not exist for legacy ssl specifications, so
> there is no getClusterSSLTrustStoreType() method. Here I am just assuming
> the keystore and truststore type is the same.
> 3. IDEA did that according to the latest import style.
>
>
> - Jinmei
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/61417/#review182181
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> On Aug. 3, 2017, 9:15 p.m., Jinmei Liao wrote:
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/61417/
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > (Updated Aug. 3, 2017, 9:15 p.m.)
> >
> >
> > Review request for geode, Emily Yeh, Jared Stewart, Ken Howe, Kirk Lund,
> Patrick Rhomberg, and Udo Kohlmeyer.
> >
> >
> > Repository: geode
> >
> >
> > Description
> > -------
> >
> > GEODE-3328: adding ssl-truststore-type to the config
> >
> > this is what's requested in the JIRA ticket. This changeset just deals
> with adding the property into gemfire properties
> >
> >
> > Diffs
> > -----
> >
> >   
> > geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/distributed/ConfigurationProperties.java
> 63f6505101f6edb62167b854d3d16d76d0a893cd
> >   geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/distributed/internal/
> AbstractDistributionConfig.java 795f6a5a4a4f42fe065c9ca6013fd5598f9311d8
> >   geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/distributed/
> internal/DistributionConfig.java c2a395de0bfe21ed8efeb6b25e331f7085b3bf4f
> >   
> > geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/distributed/internal/DistributionConfigImpl.java
> fbe894c96447b2e30594eb2ed0652dd08e1028ce
> >   
> > geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/internal/net/SSLConfigurationFactory.java
> f86f07eb5e58b8509e909b7748795530efd65339
> >   
> > geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/management/GemFireProperties.java
> 08fa9b54ea066b4158478ae89d8295ed0b1a337b
> >   geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/management/
> internal/beans/BeanUtilFuncs.java 499ef010f354ebf88765190f1b5eb945da83accc
> >   geode-core/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/distributed/internal/
> DistributionConfigJUnitTest.java 525f988cd3cb4f19872168df9b7105645f5c0498
> >
> >
> > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/61417/diff/1/
> >
> >
> > Testing
> > -------
> >
> > precheckin running
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jinmei Liao
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to