> On July 7, 2017, 11:51 p.m., Udo Kohlmeyer wrote:
> > geode-protobuf/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/protocol/protobuf/operations/GetAllRequestOperationHandler.java
> > Lines 48-50 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/60718/diff/1/?file=1771593#file1771593line48>
> >
> >     I don't think we should return an error here... If they send us an 
> > empty list of keys, they get an empty response back.

Fixed


> On July 7, 2017, 11:51 p.m., Udo Kohlmeyer wrote:
> > geode-protobuf/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/protocol/protobuf/operations/PutAllRequestOperationHandler.java
> > Lines 41 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/60718/diff/1/?file=1771594#file1771594line41>
> >
> >     I'm really not a big fan of a 60 line long method. Maybe we can break 
> > this into smaller methods?

Broke out several sub-methods.


> On July 7, 2017, 11:51 p.m., Udo Kohlmeyer wrote:
> > geode-protobuf/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/protocol/protobuf/operations/PutAllRequestOperationHandler.java
> > Lines 48-51 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/60718/diff/1/?file=1771594#file1771594line48>
> >
> >     Empty putAll does nothing. I don't believe we should log an error.

Fixed.


- Brian


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/60718/#review179967
-----------------------------------------------------------


On July 7, 2017, 9:18 p.m., Brian Rowe wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/60718/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 7, 2017, 9:18 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for geode, Alexander Murmann, Bruce Schuchardt, Galen 
> O'Sullivan, Hitesh Khamesra, and Udo Kohlmeyer.
> 
> 
> Bugs: GEODE-2997
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2997
> 
> 
> Repository: geode
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changed get response to indicate if LookupFailure was a missing key or key 
> with null value, added test
> Added GetAllRequestOperationHandler and unit test
> Added PutAllRequestOperationHandler and unit test
> Added an integration test covering the putAll and getAll operations
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> geode-protobuf/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/protocol/protobuf/ProtobufStreamProcessor.java
>  ebd5c6a0a 
>   
> geode-protobuf/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/protocol/protobuf/operations/GetAllRequestOperationHandler.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> geode-protobuf/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/protocol/protobuf/operations/PutAllRequestOperationHandler.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> geode-protobuf/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/protocol/protobuf/utilities/ProtobufRequestUtilities.java
>  b96f478d1 
>   
> geode-protobuf/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/protocol/protobuf/utilities/ProtobufResponseUtilities.java
>  2114fdbf7 
>   
> geode-protobuf/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/protocol/protobuf/utilities/ProtobufUtilities.java
>  924979329 
>   
> geode-protobuf/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/protocol/RoundTripCacheConnectionJUnitTest.java
>  31a873658 
>   
> geode-protobuf/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/protocol/protobuf/operations/GetAllRequestOperationHandlerJUnitTest.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> geode-protobuf/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/protocol/protobuf/operations/GetRequestOperationHandlerJUnitTest.java
>  b7d52019e 
>   
> geode-protobuf/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/protocol/protobuf/operations/PutAllRequestOperationHandlerJUnitTest.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60718/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Added unit tests for new operation handlers
> Added integration test covering new operations
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Brian Rowe
> 
>

Reply via email to