Github user jhuynh1 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/589#discussion_r123830138
--- Diff:
geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/internal/cache/execute/FunctionContextImpl.java
---
@@ -37,20 +38,25 @@
private String functionId = null;
+ private Cache cache = null;
+
private ResultSender resultSender = null;
private final boolean isPossDup;
public FunctionContextImpl(final String functionId, final Object args,
ResultSender resultSender) {
- this.functionId = functionId;
- this.args = args;
- this.resultSender = resultSender;
- this.isPossDup = false;
+ this(null, functionId, args, resultSender, false);
+ }
+
+ public FunctionContextImpl(final Cache cache, final String functionId,
final Object args,
+ ResultSender resultSender) {
+ this(cache, functionId, args, resultSender, false);
}
- public FunctionContextImpl(final String functionId, final Object args,
ResultSender resultSender,
- boolean isPossibleDuplicate) {
+ public FunctionContextImpl(final Cache cache, final String functionId,
final Object args,
+ ResultSender resultSender, boolean isPossibleDuplicate) {
--- End diff --
Sure we can't remove GemFireCacheImpl.getInstance now and we might not be
able to ever... but in order for it to be possible, this change would need to
be made anyways if I am not mistaken... not making these constructor changes
will hinder the effort later. Since the work is already done, was there a
reason why we didn't want to make these signature changes? Is it too
cumbersome with the number of variables being passed in?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
