+1! Very good/helpful ideas, Dan.
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Joey McAllister <jmcallis...@pivotal.io> wrote: > +1 to using "[DISCUSS]" in subject lines for this. Great idea, Dan. > > +1 also to segregating automated JIRA activity to its own list. (If we do > that, let's remember to add it to the Community web page.) > > On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 2:09 PM Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > > Hi devs, > > > > This is similar to the discussion John started about keeping track of > > changes to geode. I'm seeing some changes happening to the public API > that > > I feel like maybe should have a more visible discussion. For example > > GEODE-2892 (Region.sizeOnServer) or GEODE-3005 (new API for > partitioning). > > > > I think we should have a clear policy to send an email with [DISCUSS] in > > the header to mailing list for changes to the public API, behavior, or > > dependencies. Or wiki > > < > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/ > Criteria+for+Code+Submissions > > > > > says that changes should be discussed, but it doesn't really specify how. > > > > Part of the issue is that I find it impossible to keep up with the amount > > of JIRA noise on the dev list, so just creating a JIRA is not enough for > me > > to notice a new API change. I propose that we segregate all of this > > automated email onto a separate list, either geode-commits or some new > > list. I'd like to segregate anything not directly sent by a human - > JIRAs, > > PRs, and reviewboards. > > > > -Dan > > > -- -John john.blum10101 (skype)
