> > But we should probably create another thread to talk about it to keep this > one focused on the singletons discussion. > +1
How far can we go down the path of cleaning up Singletons without having a > DI framework in the mix? We can do DI without a framework, by just passing the dependencies that a function needs. Hopefully, this means that coders working on Geode can think carefully about the requirements for a class or method call and by thinking about requirements we get a better idea of our architecture and what sections of the code can be separated. If it gets too complicated (we start seeing a lot of places where some inner call in the call graph requires something from further outside), we can use a framework. I'd rather iterate in a way that's more lightweight until we start needing something heavier.
