+1 for that as well On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 5:21 PM Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> > > > I wouldn't tackle that at this layer. I would suggest adding a layer > > between the message and TCP that creates channels that are opaque to the > > message layer above. The message layer wouldn't know if it was talking to > > multiple sockets to the client or single socket with multiple channels. > > > > ++1 on that! >
