-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/58813/#review173279
-----------------------------------------------------------




geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/internal/cache/DistributedRegion.java
Line 2352 (original), 2357 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/58813/#comment246316>

    I think this code needs to also update clientEvent by calling 
rs.getVersionStamp().asVersionTag()


- Darrel Schneider


On April 27, 2017, 12:44 p.m., anilkumar gingade wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/58813/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 27, 2017, 12:44 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for geode, Darrel Schneider, Eric Shu, and Lynn Gallinat.
> 
> 
> Repository: geode
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> When client does a get() which results in adding an entry by calling loader 
> on server side, the client event returned back is not updated with the 
> version tag that is created with the new entry on server. This results in 
> client having a different version tag than the server side entry. If client 
> has registered event, and is concurrently updating the entry (from get() call 
> and an register-event from server), it could result in data consistency 
> between client and server.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/internal/cache/DistributedRegion.java
>  8cdc517 
>   
> geode-core/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/internal/cache/AbstractDistributedRegionJUnitTest.java
>  ba2f794 
>   
> geode-core/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/internal/cache/DistributedRegionJUnitTest.java
>  7525f35 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/58813/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Manual testing.
> Running new unit test (added) with and without changes.
> precheckin in progress.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> anilkumar gingade
> 
>

Reply via email to