Github user jhuynh1 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/451#discussion_r111275346
--- Diff:
geode-lucene/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/cache/lucene/internal/distributed/LuceneQueryFunction.java
---
@@ -132,6 +133,25 @@ private LuceneIndexImpl getLuceneIndex(final Region
region,
try {
index =
(LuceneIndexImpl) service.getIndex(searchContext.getIndexName(),
region.getFullPath());
+ if (index == null && service instanceof LuceneServiceImpl) {
+ if (((LuceneServiceImpl)
service).getDefinedIndex(searchContext.getIndexName(),
+ region.getFullPath()) != null) {
+ // The node may be in the process of recovering, where we have
the index defined but yet
+ // to be recovered
+ // If we retry fast enough, we could get a stack overflow based
on the way function
+ // execution is currently written
+ // Instead we will add an artificial sleep to slow down the
retry at this point
+ // Hopefully in the future, the function execution would retry
without adding to the stack
+ // and this can be removed
+ try {
--- End diff --
This is really an artificial time that was to avoid the stack overflow from
the function execution retry. The smaller the time, the greater chance we hit
the stack overflow but also the quicker we return to the user if the index
really doesn't exist. I can understand maybe bumping this up to a second but
10 seems a bit long...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
