-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/57001/#review166609
-----------------------------------------------------------


Fix it, then Ship it!





geode-lucene/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/cache/lucene/PaginationOnPersistentRegionDUnitTest.java
 (line 76)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/57001/#comment238613>

    You only need to flush from one member.



geode-lucene/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/cache/lucene/PaginationOnPersistentRegionDUnitTest.java
 (line 92)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/57001/#comment238614>

    Maybe use ExpectedException for this.


- Dan Smith


On Feb. 23, 2017, 10:24 p.m., nabarun nag wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/57001/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 23, 2017, 10:24 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for geode, Jason Huynh, Lynn Hughes-Godfrey, Dan Smith, and 
> xiaojian zhou.
> 
> 
> Repository: geode
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The following cases are being tested in the newly created 
> PaginationOnPersistentRegionDUnitTest.java:
> 
> 1. The only single data store goes offline while paginating -> expected : 
> NoSuchElementException
> 2. One data store goes offline while one still remains online while 
> paginating -> expected : all keys must be retrieved successfully.
> 3. Two data stores exists but we alternatively shut one down and bring the 
> other up in between getting a page -> expected : all keys must be 
> successfully retrieved.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> geode-lucene/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/cache/lucene/LuceneDUnitTest.java 
> 6d8278e 
>   
> geode-lucene/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/cache/lucene/PaginationOnPersistentRegionDUnitTest.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/57001/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> spotlessApply
> geode-lucene:prechecin
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> nabarun nag
> 
>

Reply via email to